Oxfam Decry Pervading Global Hunger, Recommends Change in Policies

By Bashir Hassan Abubakar

Oxfam Nigeria has said that the unequal global food system is unsustainable and there is an urgent need to rethink how the world feeds it’s people.

This assertion was contained in an Oxfam position paper made available to newsmen on Thursday the 8th of September, 2022.

Oxfam maintained that the world will not solve the long-standing global food crisis, made worse by the war in Ukraine, with the same policy approaches that created it.

The position paper also said that the combination of extreme inequality and poverty, human rights violations, conflict, climate change and sharp food and energy price inflation, accelerated by the war in Ukraine and the COVID-19 pandemic, has already resulted in hundreds of millions of people not having enough to eat. The effects of the war in Ukraine are expected to push a further 47 million people into acute hunger.

According to Oxfam, “In East Africa, one person is estimated to be dying of hunger every 48 seconds in drought-ravaged Ethiopia, Kenya and Somalia, as actions have remained too limited to prevent the hunger crisis from escalating.

“People in rich countries are also facing increased hunger. The rate of people in the US who do not have enough to eat rose from 7.8% in August 2021 to 11.2% in April 2022.

“While millions of people are struggling to find their next meal, the world’s main food traders have made record profits, and the billionaires involved in the food and agribusiness sector have seen their collective wealth increase by S382bn (45%) over the past two years, with 62 new food billionaires created in the sector since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic”, said Oxfam.

The paper frowned at the global lukewarm attitude of stakeholders stressing that, “the world has the tools to anticipate and respond to this worsening hunger, yet continues to choose not to act with the speed and seriousness the crisis demands. Current debates on food and hunger need to be reframed to work towards a real, fundamental change to a just food system – shifting from an industrial, exploitative and extractive model to a local and sustainable one, which contributes to climate resilience and the realization of the right to food, while reducing inequality and poverty”.

The position paper reads in parts:

This paper highlights 10 areas where a reframing of the discourse is needed. It presents 10 myths to debunk, explaining why the current framing is wrong or insufficient and provides an alternative framing, which will lead to better outcomes and solutions for the long term. This reframing is as follows:

l. The food crisis that the world is now facing is made worse by the war in Ukraine, but it is not new. The impact of the war is an additional layer to a long-standing failure in the global food system.

2. Not everyone is losing out in the current situation. Despite pushing millions of people into hunger, the crisis has also created winners – the food billionaires and the powerful food companies and traders who are able to profit from the current system.

3.High levels of hunger are not caused by a lack of food; farmers produce more than enough to feed the whole world. Despite adequate harvests and healthy levels of food stocks, hunger has increased since 2017.5 The problem is more of distribution and of food being unattainable or unaffordable.

4. The solution to tackling hunger is not to increase production, which is proposed by many supporters of industrial agriculture, no matter the environmental costs. It is to ensure more equal distribution and to address demand-side factors which increase food prices and drive farmland use for purposes other than food production, such as unsustainable biofuel production.

5. The answer to tackling hunger does not lie in global value chains. Instead, the focus should be on supporting local food production. As the war in Ukraine has shown, overreliance on global value chains has created massive vulnerabilities, as a high number of low-income countries rely on just a handful of large agricultural producer countries to feed their people.

6. Greater reliance on markets, financial actors and trade liberalization will not fix the broken global food system. In reality, we need to better regulate markets and create fairer and more flexible trade rules for low-income countries that allow them to build stronger local food systems.

7. Paying attention to gender and women’s rights is not a distraction from ensuring that everyone has enough to eat. There will be no sustainable end to hunger without gender justice and strengthening women’s rights. There is still too little concrete action to ensure that the rights and interests of women are prioritized.

8. Responding to the double crisis of climate change and hunger will not require high-tech fixes in the agriculture sector. A wealth of practical approaches already exists. The adoption of agroecological principles presents one clear pathway for building local resilience and supporting farmers.

9. Hunger is not an inevitable consequence of conflict and war. Even in conflict there is a right to food. Solutions to break the deadly cycle between conflict and hunger exist and should be promoted, and we need to work towards peace as an integral part of the fight against hunger.

10. There are enough financial resources to respond to the different crises across the world. Corporations and the billionaire dynasties who control so much of the food system are seeing their profits soar. Taxing extreme wealth and corporations’ excess profits would assist in mitigating the crisis.

Recommendations:

It is time to build a more equal, sustainable global food system for the long term in which no one goes hungry. Oxfam makes the following recommendations to start addressing the systemic inequalities in the current food system:

l. To tackle the immediate food price inflation and to ensure all people can access affordable food, governments should urgently implement progressive taxation measures and use them to invest in powerful and proven measures that reduce inequality, such as universal social protection schemes. Social protection mechanisms and food access must be reinforced in all countries.

2. Governments, donors and food companies must rebalance the power in food supply chains, and ensure that the rights of the farmers and workers producing our food are respected. More support should be directed to farmers and agricultural workers to expand sustainable domestic and local food production. This would reduce dependence on international markets, which exposes countries to supply disruptions and price fluctuations. It is essential that small-scale farmers in low-income countries are supported in having more access to funding, infrastructure, inputs and markets, and that their land rights are protected.

3. As there is no shortage of food in the world but a problem of unequal distribution of affordable food, increasing agricultural production is not the solution. Instead, we must address the unstainable use of farmland, for example for biofuel production. Rich countries must revise their unsustainable biofuel policies. Subsidies and tax exemptions which incentivize the diversion of agricultural production to fuel production should be dismantled.

4. International trade rules often negotiated to benefit and protect farmers in rich countries – must be reshaped, with greater space for low-income food-deficit countries to adjust their levels of food imports and exports, and invest in domestic food production. There should be tighter regulation of food commodity markets and their transparency must be increased, including by improving data on food stock levels. The development of strategic food reserves should be supported, given the role that stocks can play in buffering the impacts of food crises. New rules should also be implemented to prevent excessive financial speculation from fuelling food price volatility. These are all essential structural reforms in the interest of a sustainable and resilient food system.

5. Finally, there will be no sustainable end to hunger without gender justice. Real and radical action must be taken on women’s rights if we are to end hunger and the inequality that underlies it. There is still too little concrete action to ensure that the rights and interests of women are prioritized. Public policies must be enacted that facilitate women’s access to inputs, resources and services, and guarantee their land rights.

Picture Credit, Oxfam 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.